Cookie Last visit: 09:27PM on September 02

beckto's profile

User Info:

Name: becky
User type: Pending, Pendejo
User ID: 50
User since: December 01, 2004
User last visit: 06:44PM on June 09
Homepage:
RSS Feed for this User: posts only | posts + comments

Bio:

 

Past Posts:

beckto has posted 48 links and 147 comments on Alkaline Earth since December 01, 2004.

Recent Posts: (Select Last [10] [50] [100] [All])

2009 Jun 09 06:39 (#4157): Toys!
2009 Apr 20 01:26 (#4141): APS in the news!
2009 Mar 05 08:12 (#4122): Speaking of Aethermucks
2009 Feb 16 08:25 (#4110): Please tell me this was one of you guys....
2008 Jul 29 10:30 (#3946):
2008 Jun 26 10:05 (#3901): Oh yes,
2008 Jun 20 02:03 (#3895): And the record of Harbo and Samuelsen
2008 Jun 05 10:02 (#3877): These kids
2008 Mar 20 02:38 (#3776): Physics Fun.
2008 Feb 21 06:04 (#3744): Eactly which way is east

Recent Comments: (Select Last [10] [50] [100] [All])

2009 May 09 10:25 (#4148.12546):

Did you think that just because I am on another coast I would not post the following rant about your use of the term "guesstimate" ? Guesstimate is not a valid word. You are either guessing, as in pulling it out of your ass (which I didn't see listed in the survey as anyone's favorite sex act) or estimating, which is making an assumption based on data. If you take this survey into account then you are estimating how common your favorite sex acts are. If you are guessing, then don't bother clicking on the link, you don't need any information to guess. I suggest the AE team change guesstimate to estimate or I am going to go all medieval on their ass all the way from DC.  


2009 Apr 21 11:37 (#4141.12527):

Valatan, This comment from the video comments section should be able to clear up all those silly questions.

"A couple of the preceeding comments suggest that the lack of a theory which would support the observed effects is part of the problem of acceptance. Well, there is a theory which is based on a volumetric fractal that progressively fills space, creating electrons, protons, neutrons and the elemental isotopes. Mass and volume are 1:1. The electron mass is 1/1822.5, and the proton mass is (sqrt 0.75) * pi / 2.7= 1.007666313... All atoms are described as spinning arrays of electrons. The constituent protons and neutrons are also spinning arrays of electrons. This neatly supports E=m*c*c, unifying mass and energy through the electron. In the assembly of this fractal, a single geometric spatial arrangement, and a single volumetric compression, repeated several times creates everything. The elements that result are a volumetric binary code of attractive and inert volumes. If you count the attractive volumes as ones (1)s and the inert volumes as twos, (2)s they add to the atomic number of the element. The elemental models exhibit correct bonding potentials (number and angles), you can SEE the different covalent and ionic bonds. All elemental bonding is the continuation of the single geometric arrangement present in fusion. Perhaps I have been claiming too much, because no one will look at my work, perhaps I am just too old, or perhaps I am the Susan Boyle of theoretical physics? So, there is a theory that explains Pd absorbing vast ammounts of H,D, T, etc. It flattens these simple atoms into a spinning 2-D array. I will meet with any open minded physics or chemistry department, stateside, and travel to your university on my own dime." 


2009 Mar 28 10:22 (#4125.12481):

Ok, it was that next to last column I was missing. Got it. Good job Ben :) 


2009 Mar 27 09:17 (#4125.12478):

I meant, what school won the tournament.  


2009 Mar 27 09:17 (#4125.12477):

wait, is it over? Who won? Are there more games or am I just completely out mathematically? I don't like basketball. 


2009 Mar 26 05:23 (#4125.12473):

Ok, I'm confused. If we aren't counting Doncarlo's second bracket, then aren't I in second to last? I'm so confused. When does this thing end? Can we tie for second to last?  


2009 Feb 26 02:40 (#4115.12418):

Good one! 


2009 Feb 26 11:20 (#4115.12416):

Well, lets reverse the question. Who is the most recognizable least famous person. Like who would you say, damn I know that face, and have no idea their name. I'm thinking someone from a famous commercial. Like the woman from the "Head On" commercial or something. Or maybe an actor that has made their living being a Law and Order/Cold Case/Without a Trace/Bones extra.  


2009 Jan 19 12:41 (#4095.12354):

The cockles of my heart became infect around age 12 and I was force to have radical surgery to have them removed. Since then I have failed to enjoy the trite, sappy, "tear jerking" drivel that is the bread and butter of today's movie industry. You may call my cynical, but really, it is a serious medical problem.  


2009 Jan 18 10:31 (#4095.12352):

um, now that I'm over thirty are you calling me an "older woman" ??? And for the record, this "older woman" thinks Nicholas Sparks should be shot and burned.