September 02, 2004
On PTI the other day, they debated the question "Which is the bigger bummer, getting attacked by a defrocked Irish priest while leading the Olympic marathon, or getting doused by the liquid human waste of the Dave Matthews Band while taking a sightseeing tour?" I just thought I'd throw the question out there, to see what all your thoughts were on this cromulent issue.
Did anyone else appreciate that DMB offered up DNA samples as much as me? I'm wondering if a cheek swab is sufficient to match the riverboat sample...
Yes, but it will only achieve widespread acclaim if we start using it as if it's self-evident... Also: there's no denying now that Dave Matthews is a really shitty band. Also: can you imagine how gross it must be to tackle someone who has just run 88% of a marathon? Also: as if liquid human waste isn't bad enough -- apparently the boat turned into a complete and total barforama. Also: zuffle.
« Older Link from natedogg | Anti-Bush Protesters Held, NY Courts Clogged Newer »
To post comments to a thread you must login or create a profile.
It's only cromulent to provide the definition of cromulent. I fear you're flipping, slip. Or slipping, flip. Don't zuffle out on me like that.
posted by natedogg at 06:25PM CST on September 02