July 09, 2008
I keep hearing about this Wall-E movie (I think the closest we have here is Kung Fu Panda), which led me to read a little about it, which led to tangential surfing, which led me to this little nugget:
Without a head the cockroach would just sit around without doing anything much.
For more entertainment, you can scroll to find people who don't understand metaphors, people who are gullible (is this for real??), and all about cockroach mating frenzies.
Sounds like the Oxford comma! Not really but I felt like linking it anyway.
Who gives a f*** about an oxford comma?
Did I mention they're playing ACL fest? And that you should pick up tix?
« Older Baseball Trash Talk thread | Awesomesauce! Newer »
To post comments to a thread you must login or create a profile.
I'm sorry, I got derailed from being grossed out by roaches by the stellar "As both a lobster and roach lover I can give you a reasonably authoritative answer."
The intent was clearly
but I heard:
If I've been reading enough Language log, this is right node raising, a coordination of the form [A B C] and [D E C] ⇒ [[[A B] and [D E]] C], as in the zeugma
Googling {"as both a * and * lover"}
Googling {"as both a * and * owner"} gives a lot more B (non-coordinate).
So I think the problem here is that the noun "lobster" ends in the same -er as "lover", making me place them in parallel. Was anyone else tripped up?
posted by mrflip at 06:58AM CST on July 09