May 12, 2008
The New York Times Food/Dining section decided to do a special section reviewing chain restaurants. It doesn't go as bad as you'd think! In an NPR story, one of the contributors talks with the host about how the idea was presented and what they intended by doing the story. Are they elitist snobs looking to poke fun or elitist snobs just trying to see how "normal folk" live? Or, I guess, some other option but really how could that be true.
I agree that it cannot be anything but the two options you listed. The tone of the first few reviews was just so deliciously superior. I didn't notice it as much later in the article, which could be due to the different authors or maybe I just became inured to it.
« Older The salad is about as successful as the heist. | Cheese curds and Leine's not permitted beyond this point Newer »
To post comments to a thread you must login or create a profile.
Damn, 2 food posts in a row, I must be starving today.
posted by natedogg at 06:37PM CST on May 12