April 09, 2008

From that website we have a counter-opinion not of the results (the author has a "countdown clock" on his desk) but of the gall of historians to make this pronouncement without having done any actual historical research. He does make a good point, even if I agree with the survey wholeheartedly. 

Yeah, pretty much everything he said is true, certainly at the poll level. It's only a problem, though, if our disgracefully innumerate fourth estate takes it at face value.

But you can make a careful *provisional* judgement based on what we know now. If you look at the failures in common among the bottom ten, you can tick them off one by one as in the quote above. Buchanan and Pierce managed to actually shatter the union, but Bush's damage has global reach. I see that as the only open question here.

(Also: since it's the way of the internet to take something thoughtful and well-crafted, then shit on its lexical veneer: When the next round of word-rage questionnaires goes around, please put me down for "qua". The word itself just sounds terrible (qua. kwAAAA. QUAaaa!), and if you set off a screeching pretentiousness alarm in /my/ head, then brother your word is too pretentious.) 

There's been a germane addition to the sidebar. Also, the AE calendar's been turned back on. 

« Older I'll miss ya, You Rascal You | The Devil's Pool Newer »



To post comments to a thread you must login or create a profile.